Applied Research Advances

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Applied Research Advances
Articles

The Impact of Smart Packaging on the Digitalization of Supply Chains

Full text (pdf)
  • Mladen Božić,
  • Svetlana Dabić-Miletić,
  • Nikola Pavlov
Mladen Božić
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia
Svetlana Dabić-Miletić
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia
Nikola Pavlov
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia

Published 2026-06-13

Keywords

  • Food Supply Chains,
  • Logistics Applications,
  • Smart Packaging,
  • Decision Support,
  • Fuzzy Best-Worst Method,
  • Combined Compromise Solution
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2026 Mladen Božić, Svetlana Dabić-Miletić, Nikola Pavlov (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Božić, M., Dabić-Miletić, S., & Pavlov, N. (2026). The Impact of Smart Packaging on the Digitalization of Supply Chains. Applied Research Advances, 2(1), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.65069/ara21202620
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The food supply chain (FSC) plays an extremely important role in society and the global economy, while at the same time facing numerous challenges, among which packaging occupies a key position. Traditional forms of packaging often contribute to increased losses, higher costs, and reduced overall food supply chain efficiency. This paper analyzes the application of smart packaging, namely active packaging, intelligent packaging, and QR code-based packaging, as alternative solutions that can contribute to extending product shelf life, preserving quality, and improving product traceability throughout food supply chains. These alternatives are compared based on a defined set of nine criteria using a hybrid model that integrates the fuzzy best-worst method and the fuzzy combined compromise solution method. Special emphasis is placed on the importance of smart packaging in the digital transformation of the food supply chain, particularly through its connection with modern technologies. The obtained results indicate that the analyzed solutions contribute to increasing the transparency, efficiency, and long-term sustainability of food supply chains. The paper shows that future development in this field is directed toward integrating digital technologies with environmentally friendly materials to reduce waste, preserve freshness, and enhance the resilience of food supply chains.

Full text (pdf)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Wang, W., Chen, Y., Zhang, T., Deveci, M., & Kadry, S. (2024). The use of AI to uncover the supply chain dynamics of the primary sector: building resilience in the food supply chain. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 70, 544-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2024.05.010.
  2. Petkoska, A. T., Daniloski, D., D'Cunha, N. M., Naumovski, N., & Broach, A. T. (2021). Edible packaging: Sustainable solutions and novel trends in food packaging. Food Research International, 140, 109981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.10998.
  3. Al Aziz, R., Arman, M. H., Karmaker, C. L., Morshed, S. M., Bari, A. M., & Islam, A. R. M. T. (2025). Exploring the challenges to cope with ripple effects in the perishable food supply chain considering recent disruptions: Implications for urban supply chain resilience. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(1), 100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100449.
  4. Kumar, A., & Agrawal, S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities for agri-fresh food supply chain management in India. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 212, 108161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108161.
  5. Manning, L., & Kowalska, A. (2026). The threat of ransomware in the food supply chain: A challenge for food defence. Trends in Organized Crime, 29(1), 77-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-023-09516-y.
  6. Read, Q. D., Brown, S., Cuéllar, A. D., Finn, S. M., Gephart, J. A., Marston, L. T., ... & Muth, M. K. (2020). Assessing the environmental impacts of halving food loss and waste along the food supply chain. Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136255.
  7. Rizou, M., Galanakis, I. M., Aldawoud, T. M., & Galanakis, C. M. (2020). Safety of foods, food supply chain and environment within the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 102, 293-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.06.008.
  8. Lahane, S., Paliwal, V., & Kant, R. (2023). Evaluation and ranking of solutions to overcome the barriers of Industry 4.0 enabled sustainable food supply chain adoption. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 8, 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100116.
  9. Davis, K. F., Downs, S., & Gephart, J. A. (2021). Towards food supply chain resilience to environmental shocks. Nature Food, 2(1), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00196-3.
  10. Paciarotti, C., & Torregiani, F. (2021). The logistics of the short food supply chain: A literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 428-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.002.
  11. Chen, S., Brahma, S., Mackay, J., Cao, C., & Aliakbarian, B. (2020). The role of smart packaging system in food supply chain. Journal of Food Science, 85(3), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.15046.
  12. Khodaei, S. M., Gholami‐Ahangaran, M., Karimi Sani, I., Esfandiari, Z., & Eghbaljoo, H. (2023). Application of intelligent packaging for meat products: A systematic review. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 9(1), 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1017.
  13. Majid, I., Nayik, G. A., Dar, S. M., & Nanda, V. (2018). Novel food packaging technologies: Innovations and future prospective. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 17(4), 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.11.003.
  14. Werner, B. G., Koontz, J. L., & Goddard, J. M. (2017). Hurdles to commercial translation of next generation active food packaging technologies. Current Opinion in Food Science, 16, 40- 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2017.07.007.
  15. Ahmed, I., Lin, H., Zou, L., Li, Z., Brody, A. L., Qazi, I. M., ... & Sun, L. (2018). An overview of smart packaging technologies for monitoring safety and quality of meat and meat products. Packaging Technology and Science, 31(7), 449-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2380.
  16. Dabić-Miletić, S., & Raković, K. (2023). Ranking of autonomous alternatives for the realization of intralogistics activities in sustainable warehouse systems using the TOPSIS method. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems1120234m.
  17. Nugraha, I., Hisjam, M., & Sutopo, W. (2019, August). Sustainable criteria in supplier evaluation of the food industry. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 598, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing.
  18. Ortiz‐Barrios, M., Miranda‐De la Hoz, C., López‐Meza, P., Petrillo, A., & De Felice, F. (2020). A case of food supply chain management with AHP, DEMATEL, and TOPSIS. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 27(1-2), 104-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1693.
  19. Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Ghahremanloo, M., Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Banaitis, A. (2021). A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1793424.
  20. Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121981.