Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Applied Research Advances
Articles

A Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Model for Smart Governance Research Applications

Tahira Karamat
Department of Mathematics, Riphah International University Lahore, (Lahore Campus) 5400, Lahore, Pakistan
Mehwish Sarfraz
Department of Mathematics, Riphah International University Lahore, (Lahore Campus) 5400, Lahore, Pakistan

Published 2026-05-10

Keywords

  • Applied Fuzzy Research,
  • Smart Governance,
  • Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets,
  • Prioritized Aggregation Operator Advances,
  • Decision-Making Research Methods

How to Cite

Karamat, T., & Sarfraz, M. (2026). A Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Attribute Decision-Making Model for Smart Governance Research Applications. Applied Research Advances, 2(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.65069/ara2120266

Abstract

This applied research examines multiple-attribute decision-making issues that involve Pythagorean fuzzy (PyF) information. An advanced method for multiple-attribute decision-making, which employs arithmetic and geometric operations to create aggregation operators on Pythagorean fuzzy sets, is introduced. More detailed, Pythagorean prioritized fuzzy power Aczel-Alsina geometric and Pythagorean prioritized fuzzy power Aczel-Alsina averaging operators are proposed. Several associated properties of the novel prioritized aggregation operators are addressed. A multiple-attribute decision-making model is constructed based on the proposed prioritized aggregation operators. A numerical study demonstrates smart governance research applications of the developed aggregation operators. Finally, the significant advances of the developed prioritized aggregation operators are confirmed through comparison analyses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
  2. Atanassov, K. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87-96.
  3. Yager, R. R. (2013). Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4), 958-965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989.
  4. Sarfraz, M., & Gul, R. (2025). Multi-Attribute Decision-Analytic Approach based on Spherical Fuzzy Rough Schweizer-Sklar Aggregation Operators with Applications in Agricultural Management Systems. Management Science Advances, 2(1), 260-281. https://doi.org/10.31181/msa21202520.
  5. Jana, C., Senapati, T., & Pal, M. (2019). Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its applications in multiple attribute decision‐making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34(9), 2019-2038. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22125.
  6. Riaz, M., Pamucar, D., Athar Farid, H. M., & Hashmi, M. R. (2020). q-Rung orthopair fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators and their application towards green supplier chain management. Symmetry, 12(6), 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12060976.
  7. Farahbod, F., & Eftekhari, M. (2012). Comparison of different T-norm operators in classification problems. The International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, 2(3), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijfls.2012.2303.
  8. Senapati, T., Chen, G., & Yager, R. R. (2022). Aczel–Alsina aggregation operators and their application to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(2), 1529-1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22684.
  9. Hussain, A., Ullah, K., Alshahrani, M. N., Yang, M. S., & Pamucar, D. (2022). Novel Aczel–Alsina operators for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with application in multi-attribute decision making. Symmetry, 14(5), 940. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14050940.
  10. Senapati, T., Chen, G., Mesiar, R., & Yager, R. R. (2023). Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators in the framework of Aczel-Alsina triangular norms and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 212, 118832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118832.
  11. Sarfraz, M., Ullah, K., Akram, M., Pamucar, D., & Božanić, D. (2022). Prioritized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy information based on Aczel–Alsina T-norm and T-conorm and their applications in group decision-making. Symmetry, 14(12), 2655. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14122655.
  12. Ullah, K., Sarfraz, M., Akram, M., & Ali, Z. (2023). Identification and classification of prioritized aczel-alsina aggregation operators based on complex intuitionistic fuzzy information and their applications in decision-making problem. In Fuzzy Optimization, Decision-making and Operations Research: Theory and Applications (pp. 377-398). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35668-1_17.
  13. Akram, M., Ullah, K., Ćirović, G., & Pamucar, D. (2023). Algorithm for energy resource selection using priority degree-based aggregation operators with generalized orthopair fuzzy information and Aczel–Alsina aggregation operators. Energies, 16(6), 2816. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16062816.
  14. Hussain, A., Latif, S., Ullah, K., Garg, H., & Al-Quran, A. (2024). Pythagorean fuzzy Aczel Alsina Hamy mean aggregation operators and its applications to multi-attribute decision-making process. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 46(2), 3141-3171. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-232691.
  15. Liu, P., Ali, Z., Mahmood, T., & Geng, Y. (2023). Prioritized aggregation operators for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Aczel-Alsina T-norm and T-conorm and their applications in decision-making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 25(7), 2590-2608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01541-x.
  16. Mahmood, T., & Ali, Z. (2023). Multi-attribute decision-making methods based on Aczel–Alsina power aggregation operators for managing complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 42(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02204-1.
  17. Wang, P., Zhu, B., Yan, K., Zhang, Z., Ali, Z., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Power aggregation operators based on Aczel-Alsina T-norm and T-conorm for intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy information and their application to logistics service provider selection. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(7), 204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11155-4.
  18. Yang, Z., Lin, M., Li, Y., Zhou, W., & Xu, B. (2021). Assessment and selection of smart agriculture solutions using an information error‐based Pythagorean fuzzy cloud algorithm. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(11), 6387-6418. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22554.
  19. Milošević, M. R., Nikolić, M. M., Milošević, D. M., & Dimić, V. (2025). Enhancing Efficiency in Sustainable IoT Enterprises: Modeling Indicators Using Pythagorean Fuzzy and Interval Grey Approaches. Sustainability, 17(15), 7143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157143.
  20. Akram, M., Zahid, S., & Al-Kenani, A. N. (2024). Multi-criteria group decision-making for evaluating efficient and smart mobility sharing systems using Pythagorean fuzzy rough numbers. Granular Computing, 9(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-024-00466-6.
  21. Li, X., Li, Y., & Tao, Y. (2021). Representation and aggregation of multi-source information of modern smart cities based on the intuitionistic polygonal fuzzy set. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 23(4), 967-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-01001-w.
  22. Ahmad, A., Ahmad, T., Ahmad, M., Kumar, C., Alenezi, F., & Nour, M. (2023). A complex network-based approach for security and governance in the smart green city. Expert Systems with Applications, 214, 119094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119094.
  23. Nastjuk, I., Trang, S., & Papageorgiou, E. I. (2022). Smart cities and smart governance models for future cities. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 1917-1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00609-0.
  24. Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., El Barakaz, F., Lachgar, M., Assad, N., Rustam, F., & Ashraf, I. (2021). An intuitionistic fuzzy approach for smart city development evaluation for developing countries: Moroccan context. Mathematics, 9(21), 2668. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9212668.
  25. Hadi, A., Khan, W., & Khan, A. (2021). A novel approach to MADM problems using Fermatean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36(7), 3464-3499. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22423.
  26. Asif, M., Ishtiaq, U., & Argyros, I. K. (2025). Hamacher aggregation operators for pythagorean fuzzy set and its application in multi-attribute decision-making problem. Spectrum of Operational Research, 2(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.31181/sor2120258.
  27. Wang, L., & Li, N. (2020). Pythagorean fuzzy interaction power Bonferroni mean aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35(1), 150-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22204.
  28. Batool, B., Abdullah, S., Ashraf, S., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their application in decision-making. Kybernetes, 51(4), 1626-1652. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2020-0747.
  29. Garg, H. (2020). Neutrality operations-based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its applications to multiple attribute group decision-making process. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(7), 3021-3041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01448-2.
  30. Garg, H. (2021). Sine trigonometric operational laws and its based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators for group decision-making process. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(6), 4421-4447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-10002-6.
  31. Senapati, T., Chen, G., Mesiar, R., & Saha, A. (2022). Multiple attribute decision making based on Pythagorean fuzzy Aczel-Alsina average aggregation operators. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(8), 10931-10945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-04360-4.