2026: Online first section
Articles

Meta-Graphs and Iterated Meta-Graphs: A Novel Framework for Hierarchical Network Analysis and Complex System Modeling

Takaaki Fujita
Independent Researcher, Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Ajoy Kanti Das
Department of Mathematics, Tripura University, Agartala, Tripura, India
Suman Das
Department of Education (ITEP), NIT Agartala, Jirania, Tripura, India

Published 2026-06-14

Keywords

  • Meta-Graph,
  • Iterated Meta-Graph,
  • Network Analysis,
  • Hierarchical Modeling,
  • Temporal Networks,
  • Fuzzy Systems
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Fujita, T., Kanti Das, A., & Das, S. (2026). Meta-Graphs and Iterated Meta-Graphs: A Novel Framework for Hierarchical Network Analysis and Complex System Modeling. Applied Research Advances, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.65069/ara202611

Abstract

Graph theory provides a fundamental framework for representing and analyzing relationships among interconnected entities. In this paper, we introduce the concepts of Meta-Graphs and iterated Meta-Graphs as hierarchical structures that extend classical graph representations to multiple levels of abstraction. A Meta-Graph is defined as a graph whose vertices are themselves graphs, while edges represent specified relations between those graphs. Building on this concept, an iterated Meta-Graph is obtained recursively by constructing graphs whose vertices are objects from the preceding level, thereby enabling the representation of complex systems with nested organizational structures. To formalize these ideas, we provide rigorous definitions of Meta-Graphs, relation lifting mechanisms, and iterated universes, together with illustrative examples motivated by real-world networked systems. We further extend the framework by introducing the Temporal Iterated Meta-Graph, which models the evolution of hierarchical graph structures through time-indexed snapshots, and the edge-valued fuzzy iterated Meta-Graph, which enriches certified meta-relations with membership degrees that quantify uncertainty, confidence, or interaction strength. Several practical examples from microservice architectures, dependency analysis, and organizational systems are presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework. The introduced concepts establish a foundation for studying higher-order and dynamic graph structures, opening new directions for modeling, analysis, and decision-making in complex interconnected environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Diestel, R. (2024). Graph theory. Springer (print edition); Reinhard Diestel (eBooks). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-70107-2
  2. Donnat, C., & Holmes, S. (2018). Tracking network dynamics: A survey using graph distances. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 12(2), 971–1012. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOAS1176
  3. Fujita, T., & Smarandache, F. (2026). Hypergraph and superhypergraph theory with applications. Neutrosophic Science International Association (NSIA) Publishing House.
  4. Fujita, T. (2025a). Metastructure, meta-hyperstructure, and meta-superhyper structure. Journal of Computers and Applications, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.58613/jca111
  5. Fujita, T. (2025b). Metahypergraphs, metasuperhypergraphs, and iterated metagraphs: Modeling graphs of graphs, hypergraphs of hypergraphs, superhypergraphs of superhypergraphs, and beyond. Current Research in Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(5), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.58614/cris451
  6. Fujita, T. (2025c). Molecular metagraph and molecular iterated metagraph in chemistry and biochemistry. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Symbolic Science, 1(1), 43–57.
  7. Cao, J., Zhang, S., Chen, Q., Wang, H., Wang, M., & Liu, N. (2022). Network-wide task offloading with leo satellites: A computation and transmission fusion approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09672. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.09672
  8. Cuong, B. C. (2015). Picture fuzzy sets. Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, 30, 409. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55124461
  9. Xu, Z. (2014). Hesitant fuzzy sets theory (Vol. 314). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04711-9
  10. Torra, V., & Narukawa, Y. (2009). On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. 2009 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 1378–1382. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5276884
  11. Broumi, S., Smarandache, F., & Dhar, M. (2014). Rough neutrosophic sets. Infinite Study, 32, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.30310
  12. Zhao, H., & Zhang, H.-Y. (2020). On hesitant neutrosophic rough set over two universes and its application. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53, 4387–4406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09795-4
  13. Rathinam, N. D., & Parthiban, Y. (2025). A novel approach to sports analytics using neutrosophic fermatean soft plithogenic sets: Application to football team performance evaluation. Global Integrated Mathematics, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.64229/5dege109
  14. Angel, N., Pandiammal, P., & Martin, N. (2025). Generalized plithogenic cognitive map framework for managerial decision making. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 12(4), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.22105/jarie.2025.530271.1823
  15. Fujita, T., & Smarandache, F. (2025). A dynamic survey of fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, neutrosophic, and extensional sets. Neutrosophic Science International Association (NSIA).
  16. Broumi, S., Bakali, A., Talea, M., & Smarandache, F. (2018). An isolated bipolar single-valued neutrosophic graphs. Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference INDIA 2017, 816–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7512-4_80
  17. Sultana, F., Gulistan, M., Ali, M., Yaqoob, N., Khan, M., Rashid, T., & Ahmed, T. (2023). A study of plithogenic graphs: Applications in spreading coronavirus disease (covid-19) globally. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, 14(10), 13139–13159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-03772-6
  18. Campoverde Valencia, E. M., Chuisaca Vásquez, J. P., & Becerra Lois, F. Á. (2025). Multineutrosophic analysis of the relationship between survival and business growth in the manufacturing sector of azuay province, 2020–2023, using plithogenic n-superhypergraphs. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 84(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15640723
  19. Feng, Y., You, H., Zhang, Z., Ji, R., & Gao, Y. (2019). Hypergraph neural networks. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 33(01), 3558–3565. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.09401
  20. Cai, D., Song, M., Sun, C., Zhang, B., Hong, S., & Li, H. (2022). Hypergraph structure learning for hypergraph neural networks. IJCAI, 1923–1929.
  21. Bang-Jensen, J., & Gutin, G. (2018). Classes of directed graphs (Vol. 11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71840-8
  22. Gellert, L., & Sanyal, R. (2017). On degree sequences of undirected, directed, and bidirected graphs. European Journal of Combinatorics, 64, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2017.04.002
  23. Smarandache, F. (2020). Extension of hypergraph to n-superhypergraph and to plithogenic n-superhypergraph, and extension of hyperalgebra to n-ary (classical-/neutro-/anti-) hyperalgebra. Infinite Study.